> On 19 Mar 2026, at 21:38, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
> We can continue the > discussion about reducing the cost at the same time; again, I am > definitely not saying that it isn't legitimate to be concerned about > the CPU cycles expended running these tests, but those CPU cycles have > found three separate problems in two days, which is not nothing. With that in mind it could perhaps be worth to have this as a v19 open and keep the more exhaustive test for a bit to see if more things shake loose? -- Daniel Gustafsson
