On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 5:01 PM Amul Sul <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 2:18 AM Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > Path is ignored with a positional argument, I think this is a bug? > > > > This fails: > > > > pg_waldump --path /wal/dir 000000010000000000000001 > > > > And this works: > > > > pg_waldump --path /wal/dir --start 0/01000028 --end 0/010020F8 > > > > Good catch! I've fixed this in the attached version and updated a test > case to cover this scenario. > > > +{ > > + int fname_len = strlen(fname); > > + > > > > Shouldn't this use size_t? > > > > Okay, that can be used. I’ve done the same in the attached version. > > > + /* > > + * Setup temporary directory to store WAL segments and set up an exit > > + * callback to remove it upon completion. > > + */ > > + setup_tmpwal_dir(waldir); > > > > Maybe this could be deferred to be created only on first use? If I > > understand correctly, in a typical scenario waldump won't use this > > temporary directory, yet it always creates it. > > Yeah, that optimization can be done, but passing the waldir -- which > is only used once -- to the point where the first temp file is created > would require quite a bit of code refactoring that doesn't seem to > offer much gain, IMO. >
Since Andrew also leans toward creating the directory only when needed, I have reconsidered the approach. I think we can pass waldir (the archive directory) via XLogDumpPrivate, and I’ve implemented that in the attached version. Regards, Amul
v22-0001-Move-tar-detection-and-compression-logic-to-comm.patch
Description: Binary data
v22-0002-pg_waldump-Preparatory-refactoring-for-tar-archi.patch
Description: Binary data
v22-0003-pg_waldump-Add-support-for-reading-WAL-from-tar-.patch
Description: Binary data
v22-0004-pg_verifybackup-Enable-WAL-parsing-for-tar-forma.patch
Description: Binary data
