Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> writes:
> ISTM there's a clear consensus to get this committed for PG19, so
> barring objections I'll take care of that in the next couple days.
> Unless someone else wants to ...
+1
> Another option would be to leave that for mid-beta, which is where we
> tweaked the io_method GUCs last year. But we did that to get some
> testing for 'worker' (in case we revert to 'sync'), and we don't need
> that for jit.
Doesn't seem like something to change mid-beta. If it makes anyone
unhappy, we'd best find out sooner not later.
regards, tom lane
