On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:03:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > You could only fix that by blocking all signal handling during the > handler, which would be expensive and rather pointless. > > I do not think that it's readily possible to improve on the current > situation with one sig_atomic_t per flag.
Okay, thanks for the confirmation. At the same time, all the pending flags in miscadmin.h could be switched to sig_atomic_t if we were to be correct, no? The counters could be higher than 256 so that's not really possible. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
