Hi Carlos On 24/03/2026 19:32, Carlos Alves wrote: > Just one point I'd like to address is the documentation. Following the > idea of the other "includings" options wouldn't it be interesting to > present a more concise text? As a suggestion, it could be something like: > > "Comments on columns, not null and check constraints, indexes, extended > statistics and the table itself from a source table will be copied. If > the command references multiple source tables with including clauses, > any existing table-level comments will be merged into a single entry, > separated by newlines in the order they were specified."
In the second paragraph of the INCLUDING COMMENTS docs I wrote: <para> If multiple <literal>LIKE</literal> clauses specify <literal>INCLUDING COMMENTS</literal> and the source tables have table-level comments, these comments will be concatenated in the new table, separated by newlines, in the order that the <literal>LIKE</literal> clauses appear. </para> Which pretty much states the same? Please let me know if I am missing your point here. > I've attached some preliminary tests I performed. Thanks for the thorough tests. Much appreciated! Best, Jim
