Hi John, On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 10:39 PM John Naylor <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, pushed that way. I also took the liberty of moving a couple > comment changes in 0005 to here. My hope is that will reduce merge > conflicts with the AVX checksums patch, since that one also > invalidates one of those comments and it's not clear which will be > committed first.
Great, thank you! Attached rebased v14 - no changes otherwise. Thanks, Lukas -- Lukas Fittl
v14-0005-pg_test_timing-Also-test-RDTSC-RDTSCP-timing-and.patch
Description: Binary data
v14-0004-instrumentation-Use-Time-Stamp-Counter-TSC-on-x8.patch
Description: Binary data
v14-0002-pg_test_timing-Reduce-per-loop-overhead.patch
Description: Binary data
v14-0001-Check-for-HAVE__CPUIDEX-and-HAVE__GET_CPUID_COUN.patch
Description: Binary data
v14-0003-instrumentation-Streamline-ticks-to-nanosecond-c.patch
Description: Binary data
v14-0006-instrumentation-ARM-support-for-fast-time-measur.patch
Description: Binary data
