Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes:
> On 2026-03-26 Th 12:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not sure I want to expend the brain cells to figure out whether
>> this is a correct/complete patch. If pg_bsd_indent were less of an
>> undercommented spaghetti-code nightmare, maybe fixing it here would
>> be reasonable. But as things stand, why don't we just fix this in
>> the perl wrapper, as attached?
> Well, I thought we were trying to reduce the fixups we did in pgindent.
Yeah, other things being equal I too would prefer to fix it within
pg_bsd_indent. But other things are not equal: the complexity
and reviewability of the proposed v2 patch are not comparable to
a one-liner fix in the wrapper.
> However, I take your point about the ugly nature of the pg_bsd_indent
> code. So I'm ok with this fix, which is quite straightforward.
I'll make it so.
regards, tom lane
