On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 05:02:04PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: > Attached is how that would look. The idea is that small inputs will > encounter fewer branches. It'd be tricky to prove a difference with a > benchmark, and I see this as just making the small-input path more > similar to PG 18, as a risk-avoidance maneuver.
Seems fine to me. I believe we do similar things elsewhere. -- nathan
