=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Just passing by, but I think this comment should be handled manually as
> well, as I doubt we want it to end up this way:
Hmmm ... yeah, probably. In isolation the diff had looked all right
to me, but it would probably make more sense to keep this comment
aligned with the surrounding code. I'm thinking like
}
/*-----
* limit (sum(1/i^2),i=1,inf) = pi^2/6
* resj = sum(wi/i^2),i=1,noccurrence,
* wi - should be sorted desc,
* don't sort for now, just choose maximum weight.
* This should be corrected
* Oleg Bartunov
*/
res = res + (wjm + resj - wjm / ((jm + 1) * (jm + 1))) /
1.64493406685;
> (Not that I understand what this is trying to tell me, mind)
Me either :-(
regards, tom lane
