On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 12:00 PM shveta malik <[email protected]> wrote: > > I had earlier suggested a timestamp column (pt 3 at [1]) to record > conflict-occurence time (mainly 'conflict_logged_at' column) in CLT > but the idea was kept on hold awaiting more feedback. Now we can > revisit this. > > I feel 'conflict_logged_at' could be more beneficial because, going > forward (based on feedback), we may range-partition this table on that > field which may form as basis of historical data purge. I also > suggested this in [2] (see 'That said, irrespective of what we > decide') . Such a field could be basis of purging mechanism. >
Fair enough. We can extend the table with this field after more discussion, so it will be better to pick up this discussion once the base feature is committed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
