On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:49:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > John Naylor <[email protected]> writes: >> FWIW, I tried to reproduce with the former new tests un-reverted, and >> didn't see stack overflow on the following, so unless I fat-fingered >> that I wonder if there's something more specific on the previously >> failing members: > >> ppc64le / gcc 8.5 / Linux kernel 4.18 >> S390X / gcc 13.3 / Linux kernel 6.8 > > Hm, did you use -O0 ?
Yeah, that should matter. I don't immediately see why the new tests should fail at hand.. And unfortunately I don't have these environments at hand to double-check things, so I think that I am going to take a bet on HEAD. Then if things work, do a backpatch. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
