On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 5:00 PM Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 9:40 PM Xuneng Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I agree with you.  But do we actually need a
> >> > wait_for_standby_and_slot_catchup() wrapper.  I think we can call
> >> > $node->wait_for_slot_catchup() directly and simplify the fix.  Check
> >> > the attached patch.
> >> >
> >>
> >> The patch looks good to me. I agree that the wait_for_slot_catchup is
> >> not needed and could be misleading. This change would make the exact
> >> synchronization point and its intention clearer. The only price we
> >> need to pay here is bringing back the polling. But it seems acceptable
> >> since the cost was there in the pre-wait-for-lsn era. And thanks for
> >> writing the great commit message!
> >
> >
> > Sorry for copy-pasting the wrong function name. It should be 
> > wait_for_catchup().
>
> Good, thank you.  I'll push it if no objections.

While reading 019_replslot_limit.pl, Codex pointed out a few
inconsistencies in the comments. I verified them and they look real.
Would you mind doing a small cleanup as well?

-- 
Regards,
Xuneng Zhou
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.

Attachment: v2-0002-Clean-up-replslot-limit-test-comments.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to