> On May 26, 2026, at 12:53, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 05:30:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Surprising it is. I'll double-check tomorrow. Thanks.
>
> The test on HEAD was a bit incorrect; it included three checks based
> on offsets that did not make sense as the value is not reported in the
> function. I guess that this was just an incorrect rebase, that we've
> missed when the patch got merged.
>
> There was also a typo in the test, which I have fixed while on it.
>
> Done as of 6aa26be288fa. Thanks.
> --
> Michael
Thanks for taking care of this patch.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
