On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 09:19:13AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote: > Additionally put an upper limit threshold on the number of combinations to > check, fairly large by default? > > If first threshold is exceeded, could consider checking out a few more > selected at random from paths not yet checked, to avoid any bias caused by > stopping a systematic search. This might prove important when N! is fairly > large.
Please note that the latest patch available does not apply, so this has been moved to next CF 2018-11, waiting for input from its author. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
