On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 3:43 PM Ayush Tiwari <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Is the PG_RETURN_NULL() on NULL stash name / query ID intentional, or is > it a leftover from an earlier shape of the function? It looks a bit like > an attempt to emulate STRICT for just the first two arguments, but the > effect is that an accidental NULL (say, a scalar subquery that returned > no rows) silently does nothing rather than telling the user something > went wrong.
It's intentional, and your guess about emulating STRICT functions is correct. Of course, this function could choose to throw an ERROR in such cases, and that wouldn't be wrong, but I couldn't think of a reason to do it that way, so I didn't. > 2. While there, I noticed the function's header comment says "If the second > argument is NULL, we delete any existing advice stash entry", but the > code actually keys the delete path off the third argument (advice_string, > PG_ARGISNULL(2)). I think the comment is just stale, does that match > your understanding? Yes, I suppose that needs to say "third". -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
