On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:21:20PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Oh, is that all it does? That's disappointing, because that's a lot less > powerful than how I understand chained transactions. And at the same time > relieving, because that's a lot simpler to implement :-). > > In Gray & Reuter's classic book, Transaction Processing, they describe > chained transactions so that you also keep locks and cursors. Unfortunately > I don't have a copy at hand, but that's my recollection, at least. I guess > the SQL standard committee had a different idea.
The patch set does not apply anymore, so this patch is moved to next CF, waiting on author. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
