Hi Ashutosh, On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 7:46 PM Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ewan, > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 4:52 PM Ewan Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I don't think these are the same bug. I applied v20260601-0005 > > through 0007 on top of master (90354030b8f) and my test case still > > fails the same way: > > Sorry to redirect you to the wrong thread. Please check [1]. Hope I > have given you the right one this time :) > > When submitting the next report, please check if the issue is already > covered by an existing email thread. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cahg+qdfnlzsgjaq_cikspp4jh3mkoiwoawecczxa9uyr45y...@mail.gmail.com
No problem, and thanks for the pointer — this time it is indeed the same issue. I applied v20260602-0010 on top of master (90354030b8f) and verified that it fixes my test case as well as an edge-label variant of it; the graph_table regression test also passes. The fix is essentially the same as the one I posted (adjusting varlevelsup of the path queries when they get wrapped as subqueries of the UNION), just placed in generate_setop_from_pathqueries instead, which also looks cleaner to me. So please consider my report a duplicate of that thread. I will dig the archives more carefully before reporting next time :) Regards, Ewan Young > > -- > Best Wishes, > Ashutosh Bapat
