> On 5 Jun 2026, at 23:16, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 12:32 PM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> This version looks good to me, the authn_id sentence is a bit long so I might >> do some careful rewording before pushing. > > +1. I'll also think about how to better document the (intentional) > recording of authn_id during failed authorization, but it doesn't need > to block this.
Pushed with a little bit of wordsmithing. -- Daniel Gustafsson
