Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > My brain is rather fried for the rest of the day... But we could just > be looking at using USE_ASSERT_CHECKING. Thoughts from other are > welcome.
I'd go with folding the condition into a plain Assert. Then it's
obvious that no code is added in a non-assert build. I can see that
some cases might be so complicated that that isn't nice, but this
case doesn't seem to qualify.
regards, tom lane
