Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication

[Ashutosh Sharma]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:38 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:32 PM shveta malik <shveta.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for tha pathces. I have attached a patch (txt file) with a few
> > trivial changes, take it if you find the changes acceptable.
> >
>
> Thanks, I will review it and share my feedback.
>

PFA the patches that incorporate the changes from the top-up patch
shared by Shveta in [1]. These changes primarily consist of
documentation updates, comment improvements, and indentation fixes at
a few places.

[1] - 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJpy0uAdBxGpc4wtj-LcTGMNkVCYu4eMbDr27snEO_SrN2cV4A%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.

0003-Add-FIRST-N-and-N-.-priority-syntax-to-synchronized_.patch
Description: Binary data

0001-Refactor-syncrep-parsing-to-represent-bare-standby-l.patch
Description: Binary data

0002-Add-ANY-N-semantics-to-synchronized_standby_slots.patch
Description: Binary data