On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 7:44 AM Stolpovskikh Danil <[email protected]> wrote: > I found a small problem in the AddRelsyncInvalidationMessage function of the > inval.c module. > > A year ago, a patch was added that added a new type of message > (SHAREDINVALRELSYNC_ID) and filling in messages of this type was not done > correctly, the wrong field was used(msg.rc instead msg.rs).
I think you're correct, but a similar mistake also occurs just a few lines earlier. I have pushed 99db753c656 to fix both things. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
