Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes:
> I would also like to drop xml_1.out with the previous trick \if, but
> at the end if you feel that there is still value in keeping some
> coverage for the multiple NO_XML_SUPPORT() paths, that's fine by me.
> Removing half of the regression output update pain is still better
> than removing none of it.

I think it's worth covering, say, one of those paths, but we don't
have to hit every one of the duplicate copies.  So what do you think
of putting the early-exit \if after the first test that produces
one of those failures?

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to