On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 1:15 PM Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:09:00PM -0500, Baji Shaik wrote: > > v3 attached. > > Here is a v4 with an updated commit message and a test case. > > -- > nathan > I know this is a corner-case of a corner-case, but if " AND s.stainherit OPERATOR(pg_catalog.=) p.inherited", we might then get a false negative from a situation like this: t2 inherits t1 t1 has ineritance stats but somehow not regular stats t2 dis-inherits from t1, t1 is no longer p.inherited = true, but inherited stats remain vacuumdb goes looking for matches, sees that t1 is p.inherited = false, find the old inherited stat row, not realizing it should have been looking for a non-inherits row.
