On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 3:02 PM Tristan Partin <[email protected]> wrote: > I had started reviewing this patch the day it was originally sent, but > due to circumstances I couldn't finish the review before it was > committed. I had some thoughts with regard to improving the Python > script itself. Attached are some improvements that make the code > a little more pythonic as well as more easily usable locally for testing > purposes. Some of the patches may be more valuable than others.
The code in 0001-3 looks good to me (haven't reviewed the commit messages, but I assume they'd be squashed up anyway). I'm lukewarm on the remaining pieces. --Jacob
