On Fri, 2026-06-26 at 12:38 +0800, Chao Li wrote: > Sounds like 0001 will be back patched. In that case, the commit > message "defend against invalid UTF8” seems too broad. Does it make > sense to add some brief description about the defend behavior to the > function header comment and the commit message?
Right. Would "defend against truncated byte sequences" or "defend
against truncated UTF8" be better wording?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
