On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 5:27 AM Rafia Sabih <[email protected]> wrote: > So, do you suggest we can have a backpointer of conn also in > active_fsstate...?
I think that fsstate and active_fsstate have to be pointing to the same conn_state object. Do you think otherwise? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
