Hi, On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 at 23:36, Paul A Jungwirth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is this the right way to do these checks? I'll try to look into it a > > bit more today, but does this cause problems when an UPDATE *doesn't* > > create leftovers? > > I did some extra testing but couldn't find any problems. I looked at > INSERT policies when FOR PORTION OF exactly matches a row's bounds (so > the row is updated but there are no leftovers), and also INSERT > policies that include sublinks. > > > We should update the documentation as well. I think it should point > > out the contrast between ACLs and RLS here. > > Here is a v2 with a couple lines of documentation added. > I had reviewed v1 and it looked good to me, assuming v2 changes just added the RLS policies documentation update, the patch addresses my concern and looks good to me! Regards, Ayush
