David Rowley <[email protected]> writes:
> Now pushed and awaiting buildfarm feedback.

It came to my attention just now that 59c2f03d1 adjusted ereport()
to be MSVC-friendly, but did not touch plpy_elog.h's PLy_elog(),
which has a borrowed copy of the same logic.  Was that intentional?
It seems like we should keep those looking alike.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to