On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 10:15 PM Nisha Moond <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> postgres=# alter publication pub2 add table t_part_p1;
> ERROR: cannot add table "public.t_part_p1" to publication "pub2"
> DETAIL: Partition ancestor "public.t_part" of table
> "public.t_part_p1" is currently listed in the EXCEPT clause of the
> publication.
> HINT: Change EXCEPT list using ALTER PUBLICATION ... SET TABLES IN
> SCHEMA ... EXCEPT.
> ~~~
Thanks. Do you think we should restrict this case too? To me, this
seems like another variation of the above where conflicting entries
are given at the time of sub-creation itself. The root is excluded but
parittion is included .
postgres=# create publication pub1 for table s2.tab_part_1, tables in
schema s2 except (table tab_root);
CREATE PUBLICATION
postgres=# \dRp+
Publication pub1
Owner | All tables | All sequences | Inserts | Updates | Deletes |
Truncates | Generated columns | Via root | Description
--------+------------+---------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+-------------------+----------+-------------
shveta | f | f | t | t | t | t
| none | f |
Tables:
"s2.tab_part_1"
Tables from schemas:
"s2"
Except tables:
"s2.tab_root"
thanks
Shveta