On 10.06.26 11:12, Chao Li wrote:
fter reading the other implementation in [1], I realized that I had missed the
partial-index case, so I added coverage for that.
I am still sending an updated version of this patch because my implementation
is different from the one in [1]. I would like people to compare the two
approaches and decide which direction is better.
[1]https://postgr.es/m/
cajtyswxokyedvbzymwc9skrq7y_muv6xjxn4h9gfsbopd3n...@mail.gmail.com
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
Oops! Forgot the attachment. Here comes it.
This has been addressed via the patch in the other thread.
