David Rowley <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 09:42, Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I guess we should just commit that, so unless someone objects soon I'll
>> just do that. ISTM the agreement is to backpatch this too.

> How about just backpatching the new macro and leaving the old one in
> place back branches?

+1.  Breaking valid code in released branches is unfriendly.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to