On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 10:35:38AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 10:24 AM Nathan Bossart > <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1. I wonder if we should promote these to <note> or even <warning>. >> While I'm hesitant to pepper the docs with too many more of those, this >> seems like the sort of thing we don't want users to miss. > > I'm not going to fight you on that tooth and nail if you really want > to do it that way, but I don't see much point. The paragraphs to which > I propose to add this information are currently just one sentence long > each, and with this patch they will be two sentences each. Probably we > don't need markup for people to notice the second sentence.
WFM. I'm not particularly opinionated on the matter. > Also, while there may very well be people who have legitimately been > unpleasantly surprised by the actual behavior here, an awful lot of > the "people" currently discovering the situation here are in fact just > looking for a way to manufacture a security report. As long as we have > a statement of some kind in the docs, we can just point to that. It > doesn't need to be particularly prominent -- although I'm not trying > to conceal it, either. I didn't find a more natural place to mention > this than where I actually put it. True. -- nathan
