On Fri, 17 Jul 2026, 08:24 Daniel Gustafsson, <[email protected]> wrote:

> > On 17 Jul 2026, at 08:44, Ian Lawrence Barwick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > It was noted here [1] that we have the undocumented SQL function
> > "getdatabaseencoding()", used mainly in regression tests and a couple
> > of psql queries. While considering a documentation patch, it occurred
> > to me that it's a horrible function name which doesn't look like other
> > public functions, and we already have "pg_client_encoding()", so why not
> > rename it to match that while we're at it?
>
> This function seems to be referred to in extensions, how about adding
> keeping
> the existin name and adding the new name as an alias?  It would keep
> existing
> code from breaking and cause less churn in the code.
>

Why don't extensions use current_setting('server_encoding')?

Thom

>

Reply via email to