> On 17 Jul 2026, at 10:17, wenhui qiu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you for providing this information; I’ll take a close look at it.LZ4 is > just too good—no matter how hard I try to improve PGLZ, it can’t even come > close to it. That's probably true, but given that there are lots of clusters using pglz in production, if we could shave x% of time it takes to decode that could still be worthwhile. -- Daniel Gustafsson
