Hi, On 2026-06-15 16:20:02 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 2:54 PM Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote: > > I did try creating an archive of an install, but that ends up with a good > > bit > > of additional complexity, because the installations aren't relocatable > > (there > > are header paths that are patched during install, apparently). And where the > > install should be depends on the runner type, larger runners don't have D:, > > but slower runners require using D:. I think Bilal hacked further on my > > experiments around this, but I don't quite know where that stands. It's > > certainly not a trivial change. > > Huh. (How does the current robocopy relocation work, then?)
It works because the pre-existing installation is left in-place, so the few includes reaching the "wrong" directory are harmless. Greetings, Andres Freund
