HI
> > A few releases later, where I know that many deployments are using > > either lz4 or zstd and nobody has complained back, I see a much better > > argument in changing the behavior of "on" to mean "zstd" -> "lz4" -> > > "pglz" in order of priority, based on how efficient these algorithms > > are known to be. > > V2 path does exactly that. > > > It would be compelling to make this change for v19, so that it is in line > > with the change for "default_toast_compression". But I guess it is too > late > > in the cycle for that. > > The feature was frozen in April. It won't be too late to include it in > Version 20—better late than never. > > Thanks
