On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 1:45 PM Andrey Borodin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19 Jul 2026, at 19:27, Paul Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > no CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() > > As far as I remember, we hold a cleanup lock on posting tree root. > We cannot process interrupts while holding a LWLock. > > I'm afraid to fix this problem we need a real page deletion with > full fledged concurrency protocol as we do it in B-tree or GiST. > > I've written a patch for this in 2018. I hope to return to this one day.
We're holding cleanup lock on posting tree root while ginScanPostingTreeToDelete(), not ginVacuumPostingTreeLeaves(). So, I think yes, vacuum_delay_point() was deleted unintentionally. I'm going to get closer look on this in the next couple of days. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
