I wrote: > As for the speed question, I'd not poked at the details of Claude's > claim, but I guess I should have.
I asked Claude to explain exactly how it arrived at its numbers,
and the answer is that it missed the problem the first time, partly
through not trying to go higher than N=8. Full details attached for
the archives' sake, though I think this is now of mostly academic
interest.
regards, tom lane
benchmark.tar.gz
Description: benchmark.tar.gz
