On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 04:47:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Attached is my result, that I intend to backpatch. Test is for v17~. > No time to edit the commit message yet, sorry, I get that it is > confusing with the new flag name. :p
And done as 74276e685dd0. You may note that I have used the word "tentatively" regarding the backport of the test. In v17~v19, injection point waits depend on condition variables, that depend on DSMs, that have a dependency with cleanup actions not happening correctly outside of transaction contexts as far as I know. We're dealing with a wait/wakeup and not an ERROR, which should be fine at the end, just mentioning in passing.. Injpoint waits depend on atomics on HEAD, which is more portable, hence not an issue if one has the idea to do waits outside of a transaction. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
