On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 6:41 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Okay, spoiler: I did look at the code, and your LLM has just been > hard-coding a new vartag_external, plumbing it into the TOAST > internals without caring about any concept of backward-compatibility.
If "backward-compatibility" meant the need to refactor the code for easier extensibility I very much agree with you. Some refactoring would make the whole thing much more pleasant to work on, and your patches did a good job at that. Maybe we can move the cleanup/refactoring into a separate patch set to get at least that part moving ? I would be happy to help reviewing that --- Hannu
