Hi, On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 at 16:38, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Thank you for working on this! > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 at 08:13, Ayush Tiwari <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Rebased patch attached. > > Patch LGTM, it works as intended. My only concern is the unbounded max > limit; which can cause problems. I think 'max_wal_size' is a > reasonable limit. Perhaps we can add a 'force' boolean option to > function, then it can bypass the 'max_wal_size' limit; what do you > think? > Thanks for the review! I like the idea you suggested. Let me try implementing it that way. Regards, Ayush
