On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:23:47AM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 at 01:21, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: >> Another thing to note: this basically breaks the recovery test >> 039_end_of_wal.pl. Could you look at that please? > > Also fixed, including a new test case for >XLogRecordMaxSize.
Makes sense to me this way, so applied on HEAD. I was also wondering for a bit why bae868caf222 has decided to stick with a 2GB value for the record size in the written record headers, but as far as I can see it's an arbitrary value that Thomas has picked up when writing the tests, see the first flavor here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+hUKGLhFdd-G1DCk9Ze3KnQ_2jUkxyXvGwV_Ha=dwmrdng...@mail.gmail.com And the resulting commit has inherited it. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
