"Kevin Rocker" <[email protected]> writes: > Just bumping the patch to v4 for CFBot and pointed 'Discussion' to the thread > root. Also confirmed check-world passes.
I wonder if we could enforce (via an Assert) that vacuum_delay_point
is only called from places where an interrupt can be accepted?
We found that that wasn't practical for CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS itself,
but maybe we could be stricter about vacuum_delay_point placement?
regards, tom lane
