On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 11:56 PM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm leaning towards using an integer representation in v19, which is the safe
> option, and rethink it for v20 when we can consider it without any rush.  A
> compromise could be do document the integer <=> state name mapping in the
> checksums section in the docs.

+1 to keep using "version" for now and clarify the mapping in the docs.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao


Reply via email to