Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes:
> However, if one looks at the internals of any of these functions, it
> is easy to note that they are not able to handle NULL inputs at all,
> leading to a crash (aka 8f7e35b08ad5). It looks like a mistake to me
> to declare them as not STRICT, while their internals are written to
> not be able to handle NULL.
Probably a mistake, but it's of no consequence. These all take
type internal so they can't be called from SQL; if they could be,
the hazards from passing a not-NULL pointer would be far worse
than what happens with a NULL. I can't get excited about doing
work to change it.
regards, tom lane
