On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:52 PM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there a reason for your preference for an apply-time patch for back > branches Neither of the two you list. What I had in mind is that the UPDATE-time check, by design, also rejects updates whose old and new rows both match the filter, and those replicate correctly today. Making them fail in a minor release seemed hard to justify, so I did not think that check was a good candidate for back-patching. But leaving the back branches as they are is worse, because the value disappears with nothing on either side to indicate it. Some fix has to go in, and that is why I suggested the apply-time check there, since it fires only when a value is actually about to be dropped. -- Shinya Kato NTT OSS Center
