On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 at 18:25, Greg Burd <[email protected]> wrote: > I applied, reviewed, and tested the v1 patch. I think it is good and > necessary for the reasons you've outlined. I'd happily help or implement the > additional test_random_operations() for v20/v19 when I get a second > (currently traveling) if you're not going to do so.
Thanks for checking. I pushed the fixes for test_random_offset_operations(). I believe the attached is the equivalent for test_random_operations(). David
v1-0001-Align-random-test-function-parameters-in-test_bit.patch
Description: Binary data
