On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 08:13:10PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 25 Aug 2026, at 18:48, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > #2 has been cut back in scope enough that I don't think we would have > > accepted > > the feature originally if it had been subject to those limitations, which > > IMHO > > is a reasonable argument for a revert but also not conclusive. > > > I don't think that is an argument for reverting, I think it's an argument for > blocking progress by making perfect the enemy of good. > > > I'm pretty scared about all of #1-#3 having a long tail of bugs that we > > haven't > > found yet, in pretty critical areas. > > I'll prepare a revert.
Uh, I am confused. We are now considering reverting these? 1. RI fast-path FK checks / batching (2da86c1ef9b, b7b27eb41a5, 2. REPACK / REPACK CONCURRENTLY (ac58465e061, 28d534e2ae0, Antonin 3. Online data checksums (f19c0eccae9, Daniel Gustafsson and Magnus -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
