On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 8:36 PM David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 at 19:36, Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > For the same reason as those commits, I'd also leave this master-only. > > It is a v17 regression, but planner fixes risk destabilizing plans in > > stable branches, and this doesn't seem severe enough to be an > > exception.
> IMO, disabling a node type is quite a clear request that you only want > that node type used if there's no alternative. I don't think the > normal reasons for not wanting to destabilise plans here apply to > this. Makes sense. I don't think anyone would get upset that we stopped picking a plan containing a node they had disabled. Maybe 47c110f77 and 6e466e1e8 should have been back-patched too? Anyway, let's back-patch this one at least. - Richard
