I don't find any documentation for the WAIT FOR NO_THROW option other
than a few short sentences in the man page about what it does
technically. But I don't find anything about why one would want to use
it (or not). I suspect this option was added with some particular
client control flow in mind, but I think this needs to be explained
somewhere.
- WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use some documentation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use some docume... Rithvika Devisetti
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use some do... Kiran Kaki
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use som... Xuneng Zhou
- Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use... Kiran Kaki
